This manual, the infamous KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, dated July , is the source of much of the material in the second manual. KUBARK. Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources. This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining.
|Published (Last):||13 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||10.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.29 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Interrogations conducted under compulsion or duress are especially likely to involve illegality and to entail damaging consequences for KUBARK. George rated it liked it Mar 27, The old adage that anticipation is worse than the experience appears to also have a basis in the shadowy field of torture.
Embed TMS on your website!
U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals – Wikipedia
The School of the Americas: This self-monitoring is more intense if the person is talking to a stranger and especially intense if he is answering the stranger’s questions. The interrogator wants to be fair. This sort of person cannot tolerate kubakr and goes through life failing at critical ciunterintelligence.
The following questions, if asked, should be posed as soon as possible after the initial contact, while the walk-in is still under stress and before he has adjusted to a routine.
The interrogator should resist this tendency. KUBARK’s lack of executive powers is especially significant if the interrogation of a suspect agent or of any other subject who is expected to resist is countdrintelligence consideration. The sad fact is that defectors who left their homelands because they could not get along with their immediate or ultimate superiors are also likely to rebel against authorities in the new environment a fact which usually plays an important part in redefection.
The suggested procedure for arriving at a preliminary assessment of walk-ins remains the same [approx. Ines Consuelo Murillo, who spent 78 days in Battalion ‘s secret jails insaid she was given no food or water for days, and one of her captors entered her room every 10 minutes kubak poured water over her head to keep her from sleeping.
Which, while interesting, aren’t particular useful or applicable to anything else. Unless the interrogation is soon over, the interrogatee’s attitude toward his questioner is not likely to remain constant.
Because pulling information from a recalcitrant subject is the hard way of doing business, interrogation should not begin until all pertinent facts available from overt and from cooperative sources have been assembled.
The kind of person who cannot help personalizing, who becomes emotionally involved in the interrogation situation, may have chance and even spectacular successes as an interrogator but is almost certain to have a poor batting average. Traces should be run speedily. It is a protective defense mechanism. Preliminary assessment of motivation including political orientationreliability, and capability as observer and reporter. The interrogator should reserve his fire-power until he knows what he is up against.
Unless a shock effect is desired, the transition from the screening interview to the interrogation counterintekligence should not be abrupt.
If he is immediately aggressive, he imposes upon the first interrogation session and to a diminishing extent upon succeeding sessions too arbitrary a pattern. For example, he can show the interrogatee a thick file bearing his own name. Defectors of this type feel aggrieved because their desires were not satisfied in their countries of origin, but they soon feel equally deprived in a second land and turn against its government or representatives in the same way.
Counterintelligenec principal goal counteruntelligence the opening phase is to confirm the personality assessment obtained through screening and to allow the interrogator to gain a deeper understanding of the source as an individual.
As one expert has said, “Anyone who proceeds without consideration for the disjunctive power of anxiety in human relationships will never learn interviewing.
Is there a torture manual?
So simple a matter as greeting an interrogatee by his name at the opening of the session establishes in his mind the comforting awareness that he is considered as a person, not a squeezable sponge. For him the surrender of self-system to authoritarian-system was natural, as was the very principle of martyrdom. The subject is likeliest to talk freely if the screener’s manner is friendly and patient. Human beings communicate a cohnterintelligence deal by non-verbal means.
Then read it off to him.
He will naturally tend to talk about what he knows best. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. The New York Times ]. The interrogation of a resistant source who is a staff or agent member of an Orbit intelligence or security service or of a clandestine Communist organization is one of the most exacting of professional tasks. Is he to be paid? If I hadn’t found a wikipedia article listing them, I would have never understood several things mentioned counterintelligebce it.
Even worse, a “dash-on-regardless” approach can ruin the prospects of success even if sound methods are used later.
MDR for Full Text of July “KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation” Manual • MuckRock
His whole life seems devoted to reliving his feelings of guilt. As the interrogatee slips back from maturity toward a more infantile counteriintelligence, his learned or structured personality traits fall away in a reversed chronological order, so that the characteristics most recently acquired – which are also the characteristics drawn upon by kubaark interrogatee in his own defense – are the first to go.
He may be a stunt flier or circus performer who “proves” himself before crowds. The third is that the subject believes that the information counterintelligehce will be damaging or incriminating for him personally that cooperation with the interrogator will have consequences more painful for him than the results of non-cooperation. InCaballero attended a CIA “human resources exploitation or interrogation course,” according to declassified testimony by Richard Stolzwho was the deputy director for operations at the time, before the June Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
In either event he seeks constantly some proof or external indication that the guilt of others is greater than his own. The interrogator who already knows part of the story explains to the source that the purpose of the counferintelligence is not to gain information; the interrogator knows everything already. The manual advises an interrogator to “manipulate the subject’s environment, to create unpleasant or intolerable situations.