KUBARK Manual: A User’s Guide to Torture? – The KUBARK manual was written by the CIA in the s as a means of standardizing interrogation techniques. This manual cannot teach anyone how to be, or become, a good Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and. “An environment still more subject to control, such as water-tank or iron lung, is even more effective,” the KUBARK manual concludes.
|Published (Last):||17 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||19.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation – Wikisource, the free online library
kybark Even if the file contains little or nothing but blank paper, the air manyais familiarity with which the interrogator refers to the subject’s background can convince some sources that all is known and that resistance is futile.
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Adopting the tone of an understanding father or big brother is likely to make the subject responsive. She pauses, points at the interrogatee, and asks the guard how his name is spelled.
The ideal solution would be to avoid all categorizing. At the first meeting with the interrogatee it is usually a good idea for the interrogator to spend some time in the same kind of quiet, friendly exchange that characterized the screening interview. View in expanded screen. Through experience the interrogator becomes adept in this dualism.
TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » CIA, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual
He may be generous msnuais a fault, giving to others as he wants to be given to. The labor of extracting the truth from unwilling interrogatees should be undertaken only if the same information is not more easily obtainable elsewhere or if operational considerations require self-incrimination. If the specific goals cannot be discerned clearly, further investigation is needed before querying starts.
Here, too, a flat rule is unrealistic.
He sometimes gratifies his feeling of secret superiority by provoking unjust treatment. In actuality this something is a sense manuxis guilt, of the kind described above. These in turn produce unnatural pauses, meaningless sounds designed to give the speaker more time, or other interruptions. He recognizes that some of manuaus denouncers may have been biased or malicious.
It will probably prove rewarding if the room and the interrogator look exceptionally neat. For example, the question “Do you know anything about Plant X?
These differences are more pronounced in persons from small families then in those who grew up in large families.
He feels that he suffered a gross injustice, usually early in life, and should be repaid. As interrogatees these people who “cannot stand prosperity” pose no special problem unless the interrogation impinges upon their feelings of guilt or the reasons for their past failures. He is trying to do two seemingly contradictory things at once: Other applicable hypotheses are that fear increases the affiliative needs of first-born and only children much more than those of the later-born.
Then subjective distortions, not facts, will result. The most significant single fact to be kept in mind when planning the interrogation of Soviet defectors is that a certain percentage of them have proven to be controlled agents; estimates of this percentage have ranged as high as [one or two words deleted] during a period of several years after The Conclusion C.
The safer the topic, the more voluble the source. The continuing process, being interpersonal, is not reversible. I’ll take care of you later! Feeling that these misfortunes were undeserved, the exceptions regard them as injustices that someone or something must rectify. Its purpose is to keep from the questioner any guilty information or information that would be damaging to the speaker’s self-esteem. He has merely learned how to proceed indirectly if necessary.
See Inside The Declassified C.I.A. Torture Manual From The Cold War
The use of unsuccessful techniques will of itself increase the interrogatee’s will and ability to resist. They tend to think things through logically and to act deliberately.
Defectors from hostile intelligence services, doubles, provocateurs, and others who have had more than passing contact with a Sino-Soviet service may, if they belong to this category, prove unusually responsive to suggestions from the interrogator that they have been treated unfairly by the other service.
However real cooperation is achieved, its existence seems to act as a deterrent to later hostility. Experiencing relief and exhilaration, the subject will usually find it impossible not to respond to innocuous comments on the weather and the flowers. It is a protective defense mechanism.
For more information go to: If withholding, they can often be handled effectively by the Mutt-and-Jeff technique discussed later in this paper. Unless a shock effect is desired, the transition from the screening interview to the interrogation situation should not be abrupt. He is also likely to make an unreliable agent because of his incapacity to deal with facts and to form real relationships. He is often accident-prone. He may be a stunt flier or circus performer who “proves” himself before crowds.
Sometimes he seems unable to distinguish reality from the realm of his own creating. In either event he seeks constantly some proof or external indication that the guilt of others is greater than his own.
The intensely personal nature of the interrogation situation makes it all the more necessary that the KUBARK questioner should aim not for a personal triumph but for his true goal — the acquisition of all needed information by any authorized means.
The New York Times ]. Such items should be entered into the record, but it is normally preferable not to diverge from an impersonal topic in order to follow a biographic lead. For example, the [approx.